U N I V E R S I T Y  O F  P I T T S B U R G H

Special Issue

September, 2001

 

<< Back to TOC

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

...

Great Teachers & Teaching
By Thomas Ehrlich and Juliet Frey
Indiana University

 

        No single model exits for effective teaching, and no single model defines all great teachers.  Teachers should be held accountable for the performance of their students—along with the students themselves.  But outstanding teachers go beyond any measure of accountability, inspiring students to set new standards of their best.  When I ask myself what makes a great teacher and how to describe great teaching, the answer is complex.  But there are a few guiding insights that I have learned from teachers and colleagues over the years.  Based on those, I suggest the following principles of good teaching:

        First and foremost, teaching is helping students learn for themselves.  A great teacher is an enabler.  Teachers and students work together in the learning process, and the best teachers are those who see from the student’s viewpoint, who can assist the student in rediscovering or recreating the great discoveries and creations, whether of Albert Einstein or Sylvia Plath.  If one views the job of teaching as helping students to learn, rather than filling them full of facts, one sees that the best teacher exercises self-discipline, has a fine sense of timing, and retains a reservoir of unexpressed thoughts.  Too many teachers, as one of my friends put it, “delude themselves into trying to teach great truths, instead of undertaking the much more difficult task of teaching simple truths in a great way.”

        Second, superb teachers enjoy their subjects.  I have yet to meet a great teacher who is not nervous on the first day of class and on most succeeding days.  They are nervous because they know how exciting their subjects are and how important, what pleasure they give, and therefore what a challenge it is to impart that excitement, that pleasure, that sense of discovery.  Great teachers feel inadequate to the task because they know the enormity of the undertaking.  But they love it.  There is something of the stage performer in the best teachers.  Not only are they interested and enthusiastic but they assume that their students are as well.

        Gimmicks are of little real help to the teacher, but dramatic steps are sometimes useful to capture the attention of students.  One law professor, for example, begins his class in professional ethics by asking students to write the obituary that they hope might someday be printed about them.  In the process, students must ask themselves about their ethical aspirations in order to discover how they want to be remembered.

        Third, outstanding teaching requires the firmest grasp on one’s subject matter, but that does not mean having all the answers.  Loose ends mean questions raised, and the great teacher wants students to leave the classroom full of questions, not answers.  Our job is not to package the facts, but to show how to pose and attack a problem.  If teaching consisted merely of pouring into students what professors know and think, it would not be worth the costs.  What professors know and think is of no special value until students come to know it too, not from having been told by someone, but from having discovered it for themselves.

        Fourth, it is essential that teachers adapt their presentations to the abilities of their students.  Teachers must cultivate what one of my former colleagues called a “layered mind,” and they must be sure that the layer with which they are communicating is at the level of their students’ minds at the moment.

        Fifth, teaching is a two-way proposition, no matter what the setting—from the largest classroom to the individual tutorial.  Some teachers perform better in a large class.  Others disparage lectures with four of five hundred students on the grounds that most students can read many times faster than a lecturer can talk and with a higher degree of comprehension.  It is true that we may be able to read much faster than we hear, but it is not true that most of our students read more effectively than they listen, particularly if the lecturer is a great teacher.

        One of my favorite teachers of large classes gives his students sets of take-home questions that, as he says, “force the students to reshape and integrate the course in a way that I and the literature do not, and invite insights from each student’s particular background.”  As this colleague wrote, “Teaching is like planting a lot of intellectual time bombs, the lengths of whose fuses even the sapper does not know.”  As a result, students find themselves thinking about the questions not just in the lecture hall, the library, or when writing a paper, but when they are at lunch or watching a ballgame.

        Sixth, great teachers have great expectations about what their students can do.  They make large, nonnegotiable demands on their students, asking for major commitments from them.   But they are careful to let students know what is expected of them and to be fair and equitable.  Students, like the rest of us, want to be appreciated, and great teachers show a real interest in what students have to say.  As one great teacher put it, “Operate on the principle that no answer to one of your questions is uninteresting, even if it is irrelevant.”

        At most colleges and universities, students are frequently asked to evaluate their courses.  I have spent much time reading class evaluations from Indiana University, the University of Pennsylvania, and Stanford University.  The evaluations were similar in mentioning the most common criteria: organization of course material, quality and relevance of reading assignments, and availability of instructors to students.  But must important and most consistently mentioned in the evaluations, in both positive and negative terms, was the attitude of instructors toward their students.  Most students are willing to forgive a lot if they believe that their teachers are genuinely interested in them and in their learning.  If that quality is absent, few other qualities—including the teacher’s charisma—will be of much help.

        Seventh and finally, in its most important dimension, teaching is a process of exploring connections.  In the real world, problems do not come neatly packaged in containers called political science, sociology, or history.  The great teacher is one who helps students integrate knowledge and make the connections between different disciplines.  Each discipline provides a set of lenses through which to see reality.  Together, they enable students to understand the multiple facets and complexities they will face in their professional and personal lives.  The great teacher as connector is a guide in this process.

        I cannot underscore too strongly the role of teacher as integrator.  In the end, only a small part of teaching is the transmission of information.  Particularly at the university level, most of the information taught will be outdated before students celebrate their fifth class reunion.  The teacher must not only encourage students to think, but also offer frameworks within which to do that thinking—frameworks that are like maps showing the connections among seemingly disparate facts and figures.

*Excerpted  from  The Courage To Inquire, Indiana University Press.  Reprinted with permission.

A newsletter devoted to the support of teaching and learning at the University of Pittsburgh 

 Center for Instructional Development & Distance Education
1996-2004 © University of Pittsburgh, CIDDE. All Rights Reserved.
Editor: Carol DeArment, Production: Joyce Walsh
Questions or comments, please contact CIDDE Webmaster